Re: cassettes
<< Previous Message | Next Message >>
From: | "R.Wadley" <s9803537@pop3.unsw.edu.au> |
To: | histoNet@Pathology.swmed.edu |
Reply-To: | |
Date: | Wed, 09 Jun 1999 08:44:36 +1000 |
Content-Type: | text/plain; charset="us-ascii" |
Dear Tom,
Yes, I agree nothing beats a sharp #2 pencil. When I worked in a hospital
lab we used #2 pencils, tried a few brands of pen, but they were too
expensive & too short lived. In the end to cope with increasing work load
we switched to a mechanical cassette writer run from a PC. The microwriter
used a black tape & heat to write on the cassettes & removed a lot of
finger cramps. Once the system was set up properly it was as fast as hand
writing for one off cassettes, & much faster when doing batches.
Regards
Rob W.
At 03:41 PM 6/8/99 -0400, you wrote:
>Histonetters,
>
>Please listen when I tell you that a #2 lead pencil works best for
>processing cassettes! I know it goes against everything you have learned
>over the years, you know how in the medical field you have to buy the
>highest priced items. In this case, it is not true. I wouldn't spend 50
>cents on a marking pen for cassettes. A #2 lead pencil is the way to go.
>Can anyone back me up on this? Give the pencil a try-you'll be happy you
>did!
R. Wadley, B.App.Sc, M.L.S
Laboratory Manager
Cellular Analysis Facility
School of Microbiology & Immunology
UNSW, New South Wales, Australia, 2052
Ph (BH) +61 (2) 9385 3517
Ph (AH) +61 (2) 9555 1239
Fax +61 (2) 9385 1591
E-mail r.wadley@unsw.edu.au
www http://www.unsw.edu.au/clients/microbiology/CAF.html
(Under development)
<< Previous Message | Next Message >>