Re: No subject given [but really about copper]
<< Previous Message | Next Message >>
From: | "J. A. Kiernan" <jkiernan@julian.uwo.ca> |
To: | kathy_hicks_at_opr-2@smtp.mcis.uchicago.edu, <HistoNet@pathology.swmed.edu> |
Reply-To: | |
Date: | Tue, 14 Sep 1999 01:39:51 -0400 (EDT) |
Content-Type: | text/plain; charset="us-ascii" |
At 03:00 PM 9/13/99 -0600, kathy_hicks_at_opr-2@smtp.mcis.uchicago.edu wrote:
>
> Hello!
> We were just wondering... does anyone have a copper method that does
> not require 18 hours incubation time? Thanks!
>
There are two good, solid histochemical methods for copper. They
differ in sensitivity and with the chemical state of the copper atoms
you are trying to detect. There are also methods of low specificity
and high sensitivity that detect copper and/or several other metals
that have insoluble sulphides. This is a field in which the needs of
the investigation determine which is the best of several techniques,
because all the methods have their limitations.
The good solid methods use organic reagents that form coloured
complexes with Cu(II), Cu(I) or both. Dithiooxamide (= rubeanic
acid) is easier to use; p-dimethylaminobenzylidenerhodanine is
more sensitive but much more difficult to spell. The sulphide-silver
methods of Timm, Danscher and others are more sensitive, but
they also detect zinc and several other metals.
Anyone doing metal histochemistry needs to consult a textbook
of Histochemistry before deciding which method(s) to use.
My textbook (1999) has a chapter on inorganic histochemistry
(and I'll be delighted if you buy it), but for research purposes you
need to spend more money and dig more deeply. Pearse's "Histochemistry," especially Vol. 2 is a Must for any histochemical professional.
John A. Kiernan
Dept of Anatomy and Cell Biology
University of Western Ontario
LONDON, Canada.
(kiernan@uwo.ca)
<< Previous Message | Next Message >>