Re: Automated tissue processing + propylene oxide
From: | Stephen.Eyres@sanofi-synthelabo.com |
Violetta,
We have a Lynx processor. It works well and although there is evaporation
of PO, providing the machine is not filled to capacity, we have had no
problem.
Cheers
Steve
Violetta J Martinez
patico.ca> cc: histonet@pathology.swmed.edu
Subject: Re: Automated tissue processing + propylene oxide
07/08/2002 04:36
We used a lynx EM processor and epon/araldite mixture with 100% acetone as
our solvent for infiltration. It was quite sucessful. i beleive it is also
safer than Proplene oxide. Try it!
Violetta Martinez,MLT
Pathology, LHSC
London Ontario
Jamie Chapman wrote:
> G'day,
>
> Our lab is just about to get an EMS LYNX Automated Tissue Processor for
> processing tissues for routine transmission electron microscopy. One of
> the problems that our lab encountered with an older (and really quite
> massive automated machine - a Sakura - about the size of a Volkswagen)
> machine was that by the time the samples got to the propylene oxide
> intermediary step, the propylene oxide had evaporated.
>
> We are using Procure 812 as our resin. Does anyone know if the new
> machine has overcome this problem? If not, is it possible to use another
> processing protocol with Procure 812 that doesn't involve the propylene
> oxide step?
>
> Hope you can help.
>
> Cheers,
> Jamie
>
> Mr Jamie Chapman BSc(Hons)
> Senior Technical Officer, Electron Microscopy
> Department of Anatomical Pathology
> Royal Hobart Hospital
> Hobart, Tasmania 7001
> ph. +61 3 6226 4837
> fax +61 3 6226 4833
<< Previous Message | Next Message >>