Re: ProLong (was Re: GFP/mounting media)
<< Previous Message | Next Message >>
From: | "Karen D. Larison" <LARISONK@UONEURO.uoregon.edu> |
To: | jkiernan@julian.uwo.ca, histonet@Pathology.swmed.edu |
Reply-To: | |
Date: | Wed, 07 Apr 1999 10:14:51 -0800 |
Content-Type: | |
John,
It's a trade secret. You better believe that I signed on the dotted line not
to reveal such stuff. It's too bad. But then again, secret info and patents
are what enables a high-tech company to stay in business. I agree with Gayle,
however. It's too spendy. I objected to the pricing when the product was
introduced, but alas, I was only the "Bleach Queen" (yes, that was my moniker),
and allowed only to rule over certain realms.
Karen
Date: Wed, 7 Apr 1999 11:35:39 -0400 (EDT)
From: "J. A. Kiernan" <jkiernan@julian.uwo.ca>
To: "Karen D. Larison" <LARISONK@UONEURO.uoregon.edu>
Cc: uvsgc@msu.oscs.montana.edu, histonet@pathology.swmed.edu
Subject: ProLong (was Re: GFP/mounting media)
On Tue, 6 Apr 1999, Karen D. Larison wrote:
> That's the beauty of ProLong -- it really doesn't quench the
> fluorescence of FITC much at all, while still providing good anti-fade
> properties. This is a product I developed when I worked at Molecular Probes,
> so I'm familiar with it's attributes.
Sounds like good stuff!
Are you free to tell us what it really is,
or is that a trade secret?
John A. Kiernan,
Department of Anatomy & Cell Biology,
The University of Western Ontario,
LONDON, Canada N6A 5C1
<< Previous Message | Next Message >>